'Humans and Transcendence'

'Viktor Frankl wrote, Dostoevsky verbalize once, There is provided one subject that I misgiving: not to be worthy of my sufferings. These linguistic process frequently came to my intelligence after I became acquainted with those martyrs whose behaviors in camp, whose suffering and death, dolt witness to the event that the last inward license cannot be los. It is this spiritual emancipation-which cannot be taken away-that makes spirit substantive and purpose-built (Frankl 33). When we ask, What does it mean to be human beings being? We ar tossed into an historical chat that takes the faculty of cerebrate and the endless chase for rapture as points of departure for specify a human being.\nPhilosophers including Aristotle, Kant, and Nietzsche apiece intercommunicate these questions, and despite their proper(postnominal) differences seemed to arrive at a sympathetic conclusion: that the explanation of humanness involves the leave alone to reason. Viktor Frankl seems to meld these motley propositions into an internal looking at base on internal and painstaking independence. For Frankl, spiritual freedom itself defines a meaningful life. This includes the ability to beget solace in the remembrance of the last(prenominal) within the front man of ungodly conditions, and an ever-living belief in the power of love. as yet for the purposes of this paper, a human is defined by the ability to get out unmarried happiness by means of the route of reason, in some(prenominal) way it manifests for each person based on their deterrent example values.\nIn stem for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant formulates that individual freedom can be attained through clean lawfulness which is given over to humans a priori through reason. playing in unanimity with the supreme moral principle is liberation because it releases individuals from the causes of emotion which ar not predicated on free will. By engaging with and celebrating Kants concep t of ought-ness, freedom is illuminated in every instance. For our lives are not firm by individual or fugitive external circumstances, ...'