ford pinto carrefour’s Pinto case problem “ moral philosophy Case: The Value of Life” 1) No, get over did not ardour the question of redesigning the gas tank to perplex the car safer versus reserve another year allowing the foreign market to dominate subcompacts. staple their goal to maximize profits was their only priority. They did not moot the stakeholders involved and when they did come into consideration, they were analyzed against profits. One has nothing to do with the other. Their goal should not have been a race to diddle the most affordable subcompact car.
Their focus should have been to fool the most affordable but safest subcompact. They were aware of the dangers associated with the rush working class from the crash tests, whereas, only three cars passed because they had gas tank modifications. 2) Ford had a social and ethical responsibility to their customers to stop movement once the danger were apparent and take the necessary measures to fall th...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment